Legal Opinion

Nagle v. Loi Hoa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 24, 1927No. 115 and 116PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Respondents, Chinese, merchants bom in China and never' naturalized elsewhere, applied at the port óf San Francisco for admission into the United States. They had resided in French Indo-China and been engaged in business there for a number of years. They presented to the. immigration authorities certificates of identification issued by officials' of French Indo-China with visas by the American Consul at Saigon, French Indo-China. They were denied admission on the ground that the certificate of identification required by § 6 of the Chinese Exclusion Act, Act of. May 6, 1882, c.. 126, 22 Stat.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. The PizarroSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Hammerstein v. LyneDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
  5. In re Ah LungUnited States Circuit Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Van Der Schelling v. U. S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Perkins v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
  4. Gitter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  5. AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API