Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Horseshoe Casino
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 2003No. 36,927-WCAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
839 So.2d 1028 (2003)
Betty ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HORSESHOE CASINO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 36,927-WCA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
March 5, 2003.
Betty Armstrong, Pro Se Claimant-Appellant.
Wiener, Weiss & Madison, By: Larry Feldman, Jr., Mark L. Hornsby, Counsel for Appellee.
Before GASKINS, CARAWAY and MOORE, JJ.
GASKINS, J.
In this appeal from a denial of worker's compensation benefits, the pro se claimant, Betty Armstrong, contends that the worker's compensation judge (WCJ) erred in failing to award her benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
The claimant began working as a slot…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Poland v. KROGER, 404Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Burke v. Baton Rouge Metro AirportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hays v. Christus Schumpert Northern LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cook v. StoweLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Futch v. BaileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004