Legal Opinion

Par Mar v. City of Parkersburg

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1990No. 19487PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Justice:

This appeal involves a municipal zoning ordinance, but the dispositive issue presented is procedural in nature, that is, the propriety of granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Under the particular circumstances here we believe the trial court, the Circuit Court of Wood County, West Virginia, properly granted the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and we, therefore, affirm the trial court’s final order.

I

The appellant is Par Mar, an Ohio corporation. Par Mar operates a line of convenience stores and is a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sticklen v. KittleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. City of Miami Beach v. WiesenSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Selwyn Vanderpool v. CPL B.M. Hunt and Greenbrier County Sheriff DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. McFillan v. Berkeley County Planning CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jefferson Utilities, Inc. v. Jefferson County Board of Zoning AppealsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. C.C. and J.C., as next friends of the minor child M.C. v. Harrison County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
  5. City of Morgantown v. Calvary Baptist ChurchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API