Legal Opinion
Munoz v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-2701PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
After the district court had summarily dismissed his petition to set aside his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)—a statute that provides what we have termed a surrogate for habeas corpus, see Ellis v. United States, 813 F.3d 636, 641 (1st Cir.2002)—petitioner-appellant Christopher Munoz, a federal prisoner, invoked Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and filed a motion for relief from the dismissal order. The district court denied that motion as well. The petitioner appealed and now moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Because his notice of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rodwell v. PepeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Raineri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Curry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Ramirez-Burgos v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- United States v. Sevilla-OyolaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.