Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bippus v. Bippus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1952No. 12373Published

1Concurrence

NORVELL, Justice.

I concur in the order reversing the judgment appealed from. The evidence indicates that the appellant at times since the marriage of the parties in 1933 was guilty of acts of cruel treatment toward the wife. However, appellee admits that she cohabited with her husband in January of 1951. By so doing, she condoned the acts of ■cruel treatment theretofore committed by the husband. Condonation, however, operates as a bar to a divorce only so long as “the injured party is * * * treated with conjugal kindness in the future, and, when not accorded this, the former acts of cruelty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tinnon v. TinnonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Barta v. BartaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Crittenden v. CrittendenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API