Legal Opinion
People v. Saul
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided February 19, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerald Harris, J.
The defendant, Lawrence Saul, is charged with selling, on the street, playing cards without a general vendor’s license in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 20-453. He moves to dismiss the complaint on two grounds, that the facts alleged are insufficient to make out the crime charged and that the United States and New York State Constitutions prohibit the State from requiring a license to sell art.
The defendant’s motion alleges that the playing cards bear the photographic images of military and political figures associated with the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mastrovincenzo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Mastrovincenzo v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- People v. NdiayeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2009
- People v. LarsenCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
- People v. LeeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.