Neil v. Wagner
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.
This is an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act wherein the petitioners seek to compel the respondents and intervenor-respondent to include them in the resolution providing for 1 ‘ pensions-f or-increased-take-home ” benefits.
*1054Petitioners urge that respondents provided such benefits for other civil .service employees of various agencies and departments of the City of New York; that intervenor-respondent provided such benefits to 5,397 employees of its Authority and excluded petitioners and others in their class of employees; that petitioners are civil service employees…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Matter of Gianatasio v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Gianatasio v. KaplanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Dinan v. PattersonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garrison Apartments, Inc. v. SabourinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- People v. Perez, New York County Courts1971
- People v. Vitale, New York County Courts1974