Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crown v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1939No. 27374. Department OnePublished

1ConcurrenceMain, J.

(concurring) — I am not in accord with that portion of the majority opinion which holds that it is improper to give a cautionary instruction covering the testimony of one examined as an adverse witness. As I view it, whether such an instruction should be given or not should be left largely to the discretion of the trial court, and the ruling of that court should not be disturbed, in the absence of a showing of abuse. Under certain circumstances, such an instruction undoubtedly should be given, while, in others, it could properly be refused. I am of the opinion that the rule stated in the case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peizer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API