Legal Opinion

Winsor v. Manning

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 20, 1989No. 88-P-509PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant (father), a Massachusetts resident, concedes, correctly, that the Probate Court, having personal jurisdiction over both parties, also had subject matter jurisdiction, at least under G. L. c. 208, § 37, as amended by St. 1982, c. 642, § 2, to modify the support provision of a divorce judgment entered in 1978 by a Connecticut court (which had jurisdiction over both parties) despite the fact that the children, like the plaintiff (mother), are residents of that State. Contrast G. L. c. 208, § 29. It is true that the exercise of such jurisdiction presents a question of discretion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maier Hanson v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Pemberton v. PembertonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Murphy v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Binder v. BinderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Doe v. RoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bassette v. BartolucciMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  2. S.W. v. D.P.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API