E.F. Houghton & Co. v. Doe
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*305BECK, Judge:
In this appeal we decide the nature of the notice that must be given to a bank by a third party under Section 606 of the Banking Code in order for the third party to assert successfully a claim to funds in a depositor’s account superior to that of the depositor or the bank itself.
The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. In February 1982, Timothy Burno, an investment clerk employed by appellant E.F. Houghton & Co. (“Houghton”), stole over $1,000,000 in United States Treasury notes from Houghton. The funds eventually were deposited into two accounts at appellee Mellon (then…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sherts v. Fulton National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Cochran v. Fox Chase BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- DeLuca v. Fidelity BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Middle Atlantic Credit Corp. v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Ryan Bros. v. Curwensville State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000
- CHEMALLOY COMPANY, LLC v. CITIBANK, N.ADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- E.F. Houghton & Co. v. DoeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.