Legal Opinion

In re Grout

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Special Term, Kings County. Application of Edward M. Grout, as comptroller of the city of New York, for a warrant for the arrest and committal to jail of Joseph Williams for his refusal to answer questions concerning a claim against the city of New York. From an order committing Williams to jail, he appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtRich, J.

On May 12, 1903, the New York Edison Company, a domestic corporation, filed with the respondent a claim against the city of New York for $187,806.58 for electric light furnished to the various departments of the city from January 1, 1903, to and including April 30, 1903, and from time to time thereafter filed similar claims covering a period down to March 15, 1904. These claims were not audited or paid by the comptroller, and on December 23, 1904, an action- was commenced in the Supreme Court for their recovery. The city appeared in the action by its corporation counsel, and the action was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Colon v. . LiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Gilman v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Coxe v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Duffy v. LynchThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Modern Loan Co. v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Bess v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API