State v. Mobley, 22427 (9-12-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant James Mobley appeals from his convictions and sentence for Breaking and Entering, Grand Theft, Possession of Criminal Tools, and Having a Weapon under Disability. Mobley contends that the trial court erred in overruling his Crim. R. 29(A) motion because the convictions were not supported by sufficient sufficient evidence. Mobley also contends that his convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence because the State's case consisted of inferences built upon inferences, which is an impermissible basis for a conviction.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the…