Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Castillo

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1411 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

Appellees filed a petition for appointment of viewers in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, alleging a de facto taldng under the provisions of Section 502(e) of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, Special Sess., P. L. 84, 26 P.S. §l-502(e), which provides: “If there has been a compensable injury suffered and no declaration of taking therefor has been filed, a condemnee may file a petition for the appointment of viewers substantially in the form provided for in subsection (a) of this section, setting forth such injury.” In the petition, appellees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ewalt v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Rawls v. Central Bucks Joint School Building AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. In re RamseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Fulmer v. White Oak BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Condemnation of 2719, 2721 and 2711Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Espy v. Butler Area Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API