State v. Abortion Information Agency, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We would affirm on the opinion at Special Term (Asoh, J.), but would add the following. Special Term’s decision was based essentially on three findings. (1) It found as a matter of law, the public policy of the State “ is opposed to the practice of acting as an intermediary or broker in the sale of professional services ’ ’, and the Abortion Information Agency was so engaged. (2) The court found that A.I.A.’s practice amounted to fee splitting which “ on its face violates ” section 6514 of the Education Law and finally (3) that A.LA.’s method of operation constituted the practice of medicine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State v. Midland Equities of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Baliotti v. WalkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- State v. Blue Crest Plans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Accident Claims Determination Corp. v. DurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.