Legal Opinion
Fenner & Beane v. Calhoun
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 4, 1937No. 26367PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
Eenner & Beane, cotton brokers, sued B. E. Calhoun on an open account for the principal sum of $444.94, besides interest at the rate of seven per cent, per annum from March 11, 1935. A sworn itemized statement of the account was attached to the petition. The defendant pleaded that the suit was based on a “cotton-future” contract entered into by him and the plaintiff, upon margins, and that there was no bona fide intention of either of the parties that such cotton should actually be delivered, but the intention was that, at the time of settlement of such contract, settlement was to be made…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Arthur v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Gettys v. NewburgerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taunton v. Allenberg Cotton Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1973
- R. N. Kelly Cotton Merchant, Inc. v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- R. N. Kelly Cotton Merchant, Inc. v. YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1973
- Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. UpshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- R. N. Kelly Cotton Merchant, Inc. v. Kenneth York, L.M. York, Hugh D. McLane and Charles Cheek, No. 73-3838 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974