Legal Opinion

Duvall-Wheeler Livestock Barn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1969No. 26308PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804.

This consolidated appeal involves three separate actions in conversion brought by the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 against the appellants, to recover the value of certain livestock in which the government possessed a security interest.

Under the provisions of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. McCleskey Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter A. Hext, Sr., Harlingen Compress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
  4. Hills Bank & Trust Co. v. Arnold Cattle Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. United States v. Harrell's Stockyards, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API