Legal Opinion
Yancey v. Hamilton
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1989No. 88-SC-693-DGPublished
1Opinion of the Court
786 S.W.2d 854 (1989)
Gregory Lynn YANCEY, Movant,
v.
Fred H. HAMILTON, et al., Respondents.
No. 88-SC-693-DG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
September 7, 1989.
Rehearing Denied April 26, 1990.
J.B. Rees, Gregory K. Berry, Florence, Ky., Raymond S. Bogucki, Augusta, Ky., for appellant.
Asa Rouse, Rouse, Benson & Koenig, P.S.C., Walton, Ky., for respondent, Fred H. Hamilton.
Richard G. Meyer, Deters, Benzinger & LaVelle, Covington, Ky., for remaining appellees.
STEPHENS, Chief Justice.
The principal issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the publishing of a remark that an individual was a "con artist"…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.