Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jones v. Department of Health & Hospitals, Office of Mental Health

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1999No. 98 CA 1745Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partL Guidry, J.

Because I am of the opinion that the provisions governing this matter must be applied as written, as more fully discussed below, I respectfully concur with the majority to the extent that appellant is awarded one-third of her back pay with interest and respectfully dissent from the majority’s failure to award appellant the remaining two-thirds of her back pay plus interest.

Pursuant to Civil Service Rule 13.38(a), an employee who successfully appeals his or her termination

shall present himself ready for work at the time and place of his employment as it existed prior to the separation, shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alongi v. Department of PoliceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Ceaser v. State Department of Public Safety & CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Louisiana State University v. BaileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API