Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1923No. 14531PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. While the husband is legally bound to support the wife, and where necessaries are furnished to her, in the absence of any express agreement to the contrary, the presumption is that she contracted for them in the right of her general agency for her husband, and that he and not she is liable, it is nevertheless true that a wife, who personally applies to a tradesman for the purchase of groceries, and opens the account in her own name under an express agreement that she herself will pay for the goods, becomes liable upon her obligation thus entered upon. Bell v. Rossignol, 143 Ga. 150 (84 S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial City Bank v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  2. Mitchell v. TreanorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Bell v. RossignolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Goodson v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Georgia Grocery Co. v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herring v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Shaw v. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Alexander v. Duffee-Freeman Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Nabors v. Blanche Reeves Interiors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Waxelbaum v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API