Legal Opinion

More v. Burroughs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1922No. 23,440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Fotjst, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

In this action, the plaintiffs, Richard M. More, B. H. Minch, John S. Ware, Thomas E. Martin, and William L. Martin, seek a judgment declaring them to be the owners of an undivided one-fourth interest in two oil and gas leases and requiring the defendant to account to the plaintiffs for all income and profits received from the properties. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiffs appeal.

Extensive findings of fact were made. Those findings summarized the evidence on which the judgment was based. They, are too long…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hichhorn, Mack & Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Butterick Publishing Co. v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. Warner v. WinnTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Brown v. FoulksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Foley & Loomis v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Shafer v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API