Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2015No. 09-71415, 10-73715Published

1ConcurrenceOwens, Circuit Judge

We should no longer tinker with the machinery of Descamps.

*483While I join the majority opinion because it correctly applies our precedent, I do not agree that our precedent is correct. Under the current framework, hardened criminals avoid removal due to the vagaries of one state’s law, while much softer individuals get shipped overseas because of the indictment template used in a different office. The only consistency in these cases is their arbitrariness. The bedeviling “modified categorical approach” will continue to spit out intra- and inter-circuit splits and confusion, which are inevitable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. United States v. FishCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API