Legal Opinion

King v. Ed Hockaday & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 1735Published

Mrror from District Court, Kingfisher County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action between George M. King and another and Ed I-Iock-aday & Co. From the judgment, King and another bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This proceeding is now before us upon motion of defendants in error to dismiss. The motion for a new trial was overruled by the trial court on May 28, 1909. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on May 31, 1910, more than one year after the order of the trial court overruling the motion for a new trial. This court is therefore, upon the authority of the following cases, without jurisdiction to review the matters complained of in this proceeding: Sumner et al. v. Sherwood, 25 Okla. 70, 105 Pac. 642; Court of Honor v. Wallace, 23 Okla. 734, 102 Pac. 111; McMurtry v. Byrd…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMurtry v. ByrdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Court of Honor v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Sumner v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Hebeison v. HatchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API