Legal Opinion

Keck v. Woodring

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1946No. 32571Published

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by Robert Woodring, a minor, by his father and next friend, against G. E. Keck to recover for personal injuries. On November 5, 1945, the cause was dismissed for want of prosecution. On December 21, 1945, plaintiff filed his motion to reinstate the cause, and thereupon the court entered its order on January 21, 1946, setting aside the order dismissing the cause and reinstating the cause. A motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. In Haywood v. Pinkey, 112 Okla. 30, 239 P. 456, we stated that an order sustaining a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haygood v. PinkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Madison v. TrekellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API