Levy v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
Before considering the contentions of the plaintiff, it may be stated that on February 8, 1936, Harold Lentzke, who was then not incompetent, was severely injured under circumstances which entitled him to medical, surgical, and hospital treatment, and to compensation. He recovered from all of the injuries sustained by him except those resulting from a brain concussion. Following his injury, he was furnished extended treatment in two hospitals, four sanatoriums and at the Mayo^ clinic, for the purpose of curing and relieving him from the effects of his injury. ITe was also paid compensation.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Sentinel News Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Consumers Coal & Fuel Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Wasielewski v. RackeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Belle City Malleable Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- GTC Auto Parts v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Linsey v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992