Legal Opinion

Turgeon v. Schneider

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 6, 1987No. 86-517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs-appellees have made a motion requesting this Court to discharge an attachment on real property owned by them in the Town of Alburg. The disposition of the motion is controlled by V.R.C.P. 62(f), which provides, in pertinent part:

An attachment of real . . . property . . . shall, unless dissolved by operation of law, continue during . . . the time within which an appeal may be taken from, the judgment, and during the pendency of any appeal.

V.R.C.P. 62(f). Plaintiffs argue that the post-judgment order of the trial court, directing discharge of the attachment, “dissolved [the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brandon Iron Co. v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  2. W. A. Woodard Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Carpentier v. TuthillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Carpentier v. Tuthill and Hartford Town ClerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API