Legal Opinion

Dame v. C. A. Batson Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 16, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 56-776PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This is an action brought under the Universal Military Training and Service Act, § 9(b) as amended 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 459(b), for wages and benefits lost by reason of defendant’s failure to re-employ plaintiff after his military discharge. The defendant is a building contractor. On April 25, 1951 he hired the plaintiff as a general laborer. The plaintiff worked until July 3, 1951. On that day either he did not report in, or he was laid off. On July 5 he was either transferred, or re-hired, by the defendant for a new project. I do not resolve these alternatives,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Stanley v. WimbishCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  2. Bochterle v. Albert Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Karas v. KleinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Alabama Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1974
  2. Lapine v. Town of WellesleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  3. Cox v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1273District Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
  4. Bury v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API