Legal Opinion

Dedeaux v. Young

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1965No. 43271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodgers, J.

The issue in this case is twofold. First, it is the contention of appellee K. L. Young that appellant Curtis O. Dedeaux agreed to pay him a broker’s fee of five percent on the sale of property from William B. Bosworth, Jr. to appellant. Appellant admits that he agreed to pay expenses that Young might have in currecl because of the transaction but denied that he intended to pay a five percent commission on the sale price. This is an issue of fact, and we are of the opinion that there is ample evidence in the record to substantiate the finding of the chancellor on this issue. The finding of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGehee v. McGeheeMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  2. LOWNDES COOP. ASSN. v. LipseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. H. B. Owen Tie Co. v. Bank of WoodlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McCaffrey v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  2. First Am. Nat. Bank of Iuka v. Alcorn, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jones v. McGaheyMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Boswell v. BoswellMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sarbast Jaff, Individually and D/B/A Soma Agro Industry, Cross-Appellant v. Cal-Maine Foods, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API