Legal Opinion

United States v. N. Erlanger, Blumgart & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 3079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The issue in this case involves the proper construction and application to be given to paragraphs 903 and 904 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent portions of -which read as follows:

Par. 903. * * * Cotton cloth, printed, dyed, colored, * * * containing yarns the average number of which does not exceed number 40, fifty-five one-hundredths of 1 cent per average number per pound; * * *: Provided further, That when not less than 40 per centum of the cloth is printed, dyed, or colored *438with vat dyes, there shall be ’pak* a duty of 4 per centum ad valorem in addition to the above duties. * * *

Pab…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vanetta Velvet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Bonime v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API