Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Patterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1989No. 88-577Published

1DissentCaporale, J.

I must respectfully dissent, for, in arriving at its resolution of Patterson’s appeal, the majority indulges an underdeveloped analysis, thereby reaching a legally incorrect conclusion.

It is to be remembered that the information which charged Patterson with one count of first degree murder, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-303(1) (Reissue 1985), was never thereafter amended to reflect additional charges. The majority correctly observes that Patterson was convicted under a so-called step instruction requested by his trial counsel, which instruction included the “option” of a finding of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. State v. TamburanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API