Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2006No. 23942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Jerrold Ray Martin appeals a restitution order entered following his guilty plea to intentional damage to property. Martin contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in calculating the amount of restitution. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On December 24, 2004, Martin illegally entered the home of Michael and Paula Kear in Buffalo Gap, South Dakota. Martin destroyed a large amount of their personal property. Martin pleaded guilty to intentional damage to property as a result of this incident. Following the guilty plea, a restitution hearing was held.

[¶ 3.] The dispute involved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. United States v. SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Moore v. Kluthe & Lane Ins. Agency, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. TuttleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. FalkenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. WinglerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People Ex Rel. K.K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API