Legal Opinion

Austell v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from condemnation proceedings. Before Judge; Lumpkin. Enlton superior court. March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Presiding Justice.

The 60th section of the act of 1874, establishing a new' charter for the City of Atlanta (Acts of 1874, p. 131), con*183ferred upon the mayor and general council power and authority to open, lay out, widen, straighten, or otherwise change streets, lanes and squares in that city. It also provided for the appointment of freeholders to assess damages in such cases, two of whom were to be appointed by the municipal authorities, and the other two by the owners of lots to be affected; and the section further declared that “in case said assessors cannot agree, they shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Plunket v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Dillard v. Louis, Kansas City & Northern R. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Reynolds v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Taylor v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Waters v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Singer v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. City of Richmond v. ChildreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Coleman v. HodgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Hanley v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API