Legal Opinion

Septer v. Septer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1935No. 73422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*399OPINION

By McClelland, j.

It is the opinion of the court that the two documents above referred to constitute a valid and legal change of beneficial interest under the terms of said policy.

Inasmuch as the four policies above named have been subject to a change of the beneficial interest by separate written instruments, we will consider them as one group before discussing the matters pertaining to the last three named.

In order that we may properly construe said policies the court deems it advisable to state some fundamental principles of law governing the construction of same.

*400"Syllabus 1.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierce, Admx. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of DuezLucas County Probate Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API