Legal Opinion

Wright v. Bell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 3, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Iroquois county; the Hon. K. J. Pillsbury, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Pleasants, J..

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Asa Gaffield, appellant’s testator, upon a promissory note dated Dec. 7, 1874, for $1,000, payable in one year, with interest at ten per cent, signed by all the appellees.

Joe Bell made default, but the other defendants set up suretyship and a valid agreement between plaintiff and him for an extension of the time of payment without their consent, and this was the issue; upon the trial of which they obtained a verdict and judgment thereon for their costs.

It was fully proved that they signed the note as sureties merely, and they claimed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilday v. WightIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tanner v. ClappAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Byrne v. HartshornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  3. Brown v. MonsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API