Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Monroe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1985No. 83-1358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jay Cleveland appeals from the denial of his Rule 60 (b)(1), ARCP, motion to reinstate his action previously dismissed for want of prosecution. We reverse.

The record reflects that Cleveland's statement of the case is accurate. The following is the chronology of events in this case, including its dismissal: Cleveland filed his complaint on 6 January 1983. Grant Paris was at that time his attorney. Service was had on the defendant on 13 January 1983. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on 26 January 1983 through his attorney, J.L. Klinefelter. At the same time, defendant filed interrogatories…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conagra, Inc. v. CalhounCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Estes v. AshurstCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Oden v. Morgan County Board of EducationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API