Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2013No. S-12-1180, S-12-1181PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 524 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS VI. CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed, we affirm McGuire’s convictions and sentences. Affirmed. Heavican, C.J., and Cassel, J., not participating. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Todd S. Baker, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 30, 2013. Nos. S-12-1180, S-12-1181. 1. Postconviction: Appeal and Error. In appeals from postconviction proceedings, an appellate court independently resolves questions of law. 2. Postconviction: Constitutional Law. A trial court’s ruling that the petitioner’s allegations are refuted by the record or are too…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. JimNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GuntherNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FilholmNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. RobertsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. ThorpeNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. StricklinNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API