Byrd v. U.S. Silica Company
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SABRINA BYRD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:22-CV-875-SPM ) U.S. SILICA CO., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Showing Cause Why Sanctions Under Rule 37(a)(B)(5) should be denied. (ECF No. 72). The time for Defendant to file a response has expired. For the following reasons, the Court will order Plaintiffs’ counsel to pay Defendant’s s reasonable expenses incurred in opposing Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- John Doe v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, John Doe v. Pam Miller, Keith Rene Guy, Sr. v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Foxley Cattle Co. v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992