Legal Opinion

City of Fairlawn v. Forney

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1992No. 15512PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cacioppo, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Ann Marie Forney, appeals the trial court’s affirmance of her conviction in the city of Fairlawn Mayor’s Court. Forney asserts two assignments of error:

Assignments of Error

“I. The municipal court committed reversible error by failure to conduct a trial de novo on receiving the appeal from the mayor’s court.
“II. The judgment of the mayor’s court is void ab initio because the city ordinance 432.37 ‘weaving’ is constitutionally defective on it’s [sic] face and as it is applied in the instant case.
“A. On it’s [sic] face the ordinance is overbroad, vague and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BixbyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API