Legal Opinion

State v. Oropeza

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1976No. 11542PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

Defendants-appellants Jose Luis Oropeza and Gail Ann Oropeza were found guilty of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (heroin) in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1) after a jury trial. We reverse the judgment of conviction, finding that appellants’ motion to suppress evidence should have been granted by the district court.

On May 5, 1973, Sergeant Gary Twedt of the Canyon County City-County Narcotics Division, appeared before a magistrate and filed an Affidavit for Search Warrant. Twedt swore to personal knowledge that:(1) on that day a state narcotics agent had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. LangIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. LindnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. JosephsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. CowenIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API