Legal Opinion

McClelland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1921No. 12651PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Conviction of assault with intent to rape; from Muscogee superior court — Judge Munro. June 11, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. A constitutional question cannot be raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial. It must be raised in some way pending the trial. Hendry v. State, 147 Ga. 260 (8) (93 S. E. 413). In the instant case a ground of the motion for a new trial is as follows: “ Because the court erred, after the jury was impaneled, over the express objection of the defendant, ordered [in ordering] that ‘everybody be excluded from the gallery and all minors and women from the court-room;’ which order was obeyed and the parties referred to were excluded from the court-room. This action of the court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Hendry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. United Motor Freight Terminals v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Hudson v. DevlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Johnson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API