Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1938No. Appeals, 218 and 219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These actions in trespass were brought originally against the City of Pittsburgh by the plaintiffs, husband and wife, to recover damages for injuries sustained by the wife as a result of stepping into a hole in a sidewalk at night. By writs of scire facias the property owner and the tenants were brought in. Verdicts were rendered for plaintiffs against the city and the property owner, and in favor of the tenants. Upon refusal of motions by the city and property owner for judgment non obstante veredicto or a new trial, the city alone appealed.

The accident occurred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lerner v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Fordyce v. White Star Bus LinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Brown v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Landy v. RomeoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Canfield v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Robert A. Garr and Lorraine Garr, His Wife v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API