Legal Opinion

Beardsley v. Marsteller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1889No. 13,758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From tbe Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was commenced by Nicholas Marsteller against George T. TenEyck, to recover money paid by the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of A. J. Mor- . ley, deceased, on a claim which the defendant held against, the above mentioned estate. Pending the suit the death of TenEyck was suggested on the record, and George T. Beardsley, executor of his estate, was substituted as defendant.

The special finding of the court presents all the facts material to be considered' in determining the merits of the controversy. It is found that TenEyck had a claim amounting to $1,368 against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ayers v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Carson v. M'FarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
  3. Egbert v. RushIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Wheeler v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. H. B. Claflin Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division v. Estate of CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Riddell Nat'l Bank Etc. v. EnglehartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Riddell Nat'l Bank Etc. v. EnglehartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Riddell Nat'l Bank Etc. v. EnglehartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API