Patrick v. Clark Oil & Refining Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
This is a workers’ compensation ease that presents two questions:
*415(1) Was the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) correct when it ruled that § 287.220.91 (the dual employment statute that implicates the Second Injury Fund) was substantive and not susceptible to retroactive application as Claimant contends?(2) Did the Commission err when it computed Employee’s average weekly wage?
We answer “yes” to both questions. We affirm in part; we reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
Francis Patrick (Employee) held two employments at the time of his death on August 5, 1998. He…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Leutzinger v. Treasurer of Missouri Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Williams v. CavenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Snowbarger v. M. F. A. Central Co-OperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goad v. Treasurer of the StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Dalba v. YMCA of Greater St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002