Roger Williams v. USA and Internal Revenue Service
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROGER WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF No. 4:22-cv-942-DPM USA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DEFENDANTS ORDER Williams’s motion for some relief from the Court’s Order setting aside the jury’s verdict and from its Amended Judgment is denied. First, the Court stands by its post-trial decision that — given Williams’s testimony about what he knew, did, and didn’t do—the United States was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. E.g., Colosimo v. United States,
630 F.3d 749, 753
(8th Cir. 2011). Second, the Court continues to believe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Niemiec v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Oppliger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Colosimo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Starks v. Rent-A-CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995