Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Wathen

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Max Frankel against John B. Wathen and others. Defendant Wathen appeals from a judgment for plaintiff, entered on trial by a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

This action was brought to recover commissions earned by the sale of whiskies, and also for services in superintending a farm belonging to the defendants, and for various sums of money laid out and disbursed for them, and loaned and advanced to them, all of which they promised to pay. The plaintiff also alleged that from time to time he had rendered an account to the defendants, copies of which are annexed to the complaint, upon which the defendants made various payments. He also alleged that the items charged in the account are true and correct in all respects. The defendants denied any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Murray v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Martin v. BlissNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. American Linen Thread Company v. . WortendykeNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beach v. KidderNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Quimby v. ClockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Reading Braid Co. v. StewartAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. Wolff v. DenboskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API