Legal Opinion
Sahl v. Town of York
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 24, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] E.F.H., Inc., Peter and Patrick Hughes (collectively, the Hugheses), and the Town of York appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) vacating the decision of the York Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) which had authorized the Hugheses to complete a motel expansion. The Hughes-es contend that the Superior Court erred in holding that (i) the Sahls and the Crafts, owners of residential property near the motel, had standing to sue; and (ii) the ZBA erred in determining that the Hugheses’ right to complete construction had vested. Because there is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Town of Orangetown v. MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Thomas v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Forester v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Adelman v. Town of BaldwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- City of Portland v. Fisherman's Wharf Associates IISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v. Town of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Wister v. Town of Mount DesertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- NECEC Transmission LLC v. Bureau of Parks and LandsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- Town of Vassalboro v. BarnettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Witham Family Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Bar HarborSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.