Kahn v. Starrels
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Sur Motion of Appellee as to Costs.
1Per curiam
The court below dismissed the bill, and the complainants appealed to this court. We have held that two of the claims of the patent in suit are valid, and were infringed by the defendant (appellee), and accordingly we have reversed the decree below, and will remand the case to the court below, with directions to enter a decree in favor of the complainants in accordance-with our opinion. It now appears that the appellants have filed a disclaimer as to the third claim of the patent, which we held to be invalid, and the present motion is based upon the contention of the appellee that under the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Sachs v. Hartford Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Excelsior Steel Furnace Co. v. F. Meyer & Bro. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
- Bankers' Utilities Co. v. Pacific Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- General Electric Co. v. Crouse-Hinds Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1906
- Johnson v. Foos Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905