United States v. Fisherman
Washington Territory
Appeal from tbe District Court bolding terms at Seattle. Third District.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoyt
Appellee moved to dismiss the appeal herein because, —1. Said appeal has not been taken and perfected in accordance with the rules of the civil law; 2. There is no such record here as gives this court jurisdiction to hear and determine under the act of 1883 relating to appeals. In our opinion, the position of appellee is clearly right as to the first point, for the only notice of appeal in the transcript was given over two months after the judgment, .and over forty days after the expiration of the time given at the time of sentence in which to per-*317feet an appeal, and presumably at another…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Enos v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1891