People v. Sampsell
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985.
We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Cabdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Ceane, Andeews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; O’Bbien, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Grossman v. BaumgartnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Metallic Flowers, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- People v. ManginiNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.