Legal Opinion

People v. Sampsell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985.

We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Cabdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Ceane, Andeews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; O’Bbien, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Grossman v. BaumgartnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Metallic Flowers, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. People v. ManginiNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API