Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 2000No. 2D99-2181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Katharthur Mills appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The trial court announced that it was sentencing Mr. Mills as a violent career criminal. The sentencing documents, however, indicate that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. This should be corrected on remand to reflect that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a violent career criminal. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding that written sentence must conform to oral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bogan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API