Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grimmett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1972No. 5595Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I concur in the result reached by the majority, on rehearing, because I am now of the opinion that the drugs and merchandise seized were not contraband, and it was not illegal for the doctor, a dispensing physician, to possess them. See Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 82-2107 (a) (5), (c); 82-2105 (a) (Supp. 1971). Furthermore, I do not think that there was authority for a warrant to seize the books and records, although I think there is ample authority for inspecting and copying them. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2107(e). My views on the subject are expressed in my concurring opinion in Ferguson v. State, 249…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herman Wilson Lumber Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. County of Searcy v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  4. Satterfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API